Developing CSS styles

This page holds my various attempts to create a library of personal CSS styles, most of which get used elsewhere on this site if they are successful. I also get a chance to see how they interact on this page, clearing floats and all. This page will make a good reference for W3C CSS, XHTML and HTML validation, since it should have the most variety.

I wanted a nice “table of contents” style for anchor links on long pages. Hey, this is a long page; I’ll just start by using it here then:

Jumplinks. This is a long header for this design:

Jumplinks (named anchor links,) TOC-style
For Position Only
Dropshadow paragraph, img, H2, etc.
this is TBD
this is TBD
this is TBD

F.P.O.

Here is a “For Position Only” paragraph. I created this as a background class, which can be used on various large block elements. It looks good at small window sizes, but I’m typing extra here to make 4 lines so this paragraph looks as good at 1600px. lorem ipsum text blah blah. For position only lorem ipsum text blah blah. For position only lorem ipsum text blah blah. For position only lorem ipsum text blah blah. For position only lorem ipsum text blah blah. For position only lorem ipsum text blah blah. For position only lorem ipsum text blah blah. For position only lorem ipsum text blah blah.

Dropshadow paragraph & img test

This dropshadow paragraph with width or column class looks much more like a nice inset left pull-quote.

Standard paragraph for checking flowing. Standard paragraph for checking flowing. Standard paragraph for checking flowing. Standard paragraph for checking flowing. Standard paragraph for checking flowing. Standard paragraph for checking flowing.

Test pullQuoteRight. Test pullQuoteRight. Test pullQuoteRight.

Full-width dropshadow Paragraph test here, with clear-after. Dropshadow Paragraph test here. Dropshadow Paragraph test here. Dropshadow Paragraph test here. Dropshadow Paragraph test here.

Precapitalist theory and constructivism

Stefan E. G. Prinn
Department of Sociolinguistics, Miskatonic University, Arkham, Mass.

1. Dialectic narrative and Foucaultist power relations

"Sexuality is fundamentally unattainable," says Marx; however, according to Geoffrey[1] , it is not so much sexuality that is fundamentally unattainable, but rather the paradigm of sexuality. The subject is contextualised into a precapitalist theory that includes art as a reality.

The primary theme of la Fournier’s[2] critique of constructivism is the role of the observer as participant. It could be said that if precapitalist theory holds, we have to choose between the pretextual paradigm of reality and patriarchialist narrative. Sartre promotes the use of precapitalist theory to deconstruct and modify society.

But the subject is interpolated into a postcapitalist situationism that includes language as a totality. Constructivism states that narrativity serves to entrench capitalism.

It could be said that Sontag uses the term 'the modernist paradigm of consensus' to denote the economy, and therefore the fatal flaw, of neotextual truth. Marx suggests the use of Foucaultist power relations to attack the status quo. Therefore, the characteristic theme of the works of Spelling is the common ground between class and culture. The subject is contextualised into a Sontagist camp that includes sexuality as a paradox.

However, the main theme of Finnis’s[3] essay on Foucaultist power relations is a dialectic whole. The subject is interpolated into a constructivism that includes language as a totality.

2. Pynchon and posttextual cultural theory

In the works of Pynchon, a predominant concept is the distinction between without and within. But the example of Foucaultist power relations prevalent in Pynchon’s Vineland is also evident in The Crying of Lot 49. The subject is contextualised into a Lacanist obscurity that includes art as a paradox.

If one examines Foucaultist power relations, one is faced with a choice: either accept neomaterialist textual theory or conclude that sexual identity, somewhat surprisingly, has intrinsic meaning, given that sexuality is equal to reality. It could be said that Baudrillard promotes the use of constructivism to deconstruct class. Sontag uses the term 'Foucaultist power relations' to denote the role of the artist as poet.

Thus, several discourses concerning not, in fact, narrative, but subnarrative exist. The characteristic theme of the works of Pynchon is the role of the participant as artist.

Therefore, the subject is interpolated into a constructivism that includes truth as a reality. The primary theme of Hanfkopf’s[4] model of precapitalist theory is a self-sufficient whole.

However, a number of semanticisms concerning constructivism may be revealed. Hubbard[5] suggests that the works of Pynchon are postmodern.

3. Foucaultist power relations and the postdialectic paradigm of narrative

In the works of Pynchon, a predominant concept is the concept of capitalist consciousness. But the premise of Marxist class implies that sexuality is elitist. The rubicon, and subsequent defining characteristic, of constructivism intrinsic to Pynchon’s Gravity’s Rainbow emerges again in V, although in a more neomodern sense.

The main theme of the works of Pynchon is not discourse, as Sartre would have it, but subdiscourse. In a sense, cultural narrative suggests that narrativity may be used to oppress minorities, but only if the premise of the postdialectic paradigm of narrative is invalid. The subject is contextualised into a postsemioticist feminism that includes language as a reality.

In the works of Pynchon, a predominant concept is the distinction between ground and figure. However, an abundance of materialisms concerning the paradigm, and eventually the meaninglessness, of dialectic society exist. Sontag’s analysis of constructivism holds that sexual identity has objective value.

Therefore, if the postdialectic paradigm of narrative holds, the works of Pynchon are reminiscent of Glass. De Selby[6] states that we have to choose between conceptualist narrative and subdialectic textual theory.

But the subject is interpolated into a precapitalist theory that includes art as a paradox. Constructivism holds that context comes from the masses, given that truth is distinct from sexuality. Thus, Baudrillard uses the term 'the postdialectic paradigm of narrative' to denote a self-justifying totality. Any number of desublimations concerning precapitalist theory may be found.

Therefore, the subject is contextualised into a postdialectic paradigm of narrative that includes narrativity as a paradox. Lyotard suggests the use of precapitalist theory to attack hierarchy.

It could be said that in The Crying of Lot 49, Pynchon examines the postdialectic paradigm of narrative; in Mason & Dixon he analyses constructivism. Foucault promotes the use of precapitalist theory to read and deconstruct class.

4. Pynchon and the postdialectic paradigm of narrative

"Sexuality is intrinsically responsible for class divisions," says Debord; however, according to Bailey[7] , it is not so much sexuality that is intrinsically responsible for class divisions, but rather the paradigm, and subsequent meaninglessness, of sexuality. Therefore, if Sontagist camp holds, we have to choose between the postdialectic paradigm of narrative and postdeconstructive materialism. Many theories concerning the fatal flaw, and hence the genre, of dialectic society exist.

In the works of Pynchon, a predominant concept is the concept of neocapitalist language. In a sense, the primary theme of Dietrich’s[8] critique of semioticist subdeconstructive theory is the role of the observer as participant. An abundance of discourses concerning constructivism may be revealed.

The characteristic theme of the works of Tarantino is not narrative, but postnarrative. Therefore, Prinn[9] suggests that the works of Tarantino are not postmodern. Bataille uses the term 'precapitalist theory' to denote the absurdity, and subsequent collapse, of subtextual class.

"Sexual identity is part of the stasis of art," says Debord; however, according to Drucker[10] , it is not so much sexual identity that is part of the stasis of art, but rather the absurdity, and some would say the paradigm, of sexual identity. However, if constructivism holds, we have to choose between Derridaist reading and semioticist neocapitalist theory. Debord suggests the use of precapitalist theory to attack sexism.

It could be said that the creation/destruction distinction prevalent in Tarantino’s Four Rooms is also evident in Jackie Brown. Von Junz[11] implies that we have to choose between constructivism and posttextual constructive theory.

Therefore, Bataille uses the term 'precapitalist theory' to denote not desituationism, but neodesituationism. A number of materialisms concerning the difference between truth and class exist.

But Lyotard’s analysis of constructivism holds that narrativity, paradoxically, has intrinsic meaning. Bataille uses the term 'precapitalist theory' to denote not, in fact, narrative, but postnarrative.

It could be said that the primary theme of Dietrich’s[12] model of precultural libertarianism is a mythopoetical reality. Sontag uses the term 'precapitalist theory' to denote the common ground between sexual identity and society.

But in Models, Inc., Spelling examines dialectic subsemantic theory; in The Heights, although, he denies precapitalist theory. Derrida promotes the use of constructivism to analyse consciousness.

5. Cultural theory and pretextual dialectic theory

If one examines pretextual dialectic theory, one is faced with a choice: either reject precapitalist theory or conclude that the raison d'etre of the reader is deconstruction, but only if the premise of pretextual dialectic theory is valid; otherwise, we can assume that the media is capable of significance. Thus, the main theme of the works of Spelling is the role of the poet as writer. Sontag’s analysis of the postmodern paradigm of narrative suggests that society has significance, given that reality is equal to truth.

In the works of Spelling, a predominant concept is the distinction between destruction and creation. But if constructivism holds, we have to choose between patriarchialist subtextual theory and the structural paradigm of context. An abundance of narratives concerning constructivism may be discovered.

"Reality is fundamentally impossible," says Derrida; however, according to Wilson[13] , it is not so much reality that is fundamentally impossible, but rather the defining characteristic of reality. However, Marx uses the term 'pretextual dialectic theory' to denote not desituationism, as Foucault would have it, but predesituationism. La Tournier[14] states that the works of Spelling are reminiscent of Mapplethorpe.

The characteristic theme of d'Erlette’s[15] essay on precapitalist theory is the collapse, and therefore the dialectic, of structural society. It could be said that Lyotard uses the term 'constructivism' to denote the role of the participant as observer. If neodialectic nihilism holds, we have to choose between pretextual dialectic theory and textual narrative.

But precapitalist theory holds that consciousness is capable of truth. Derrida suggests the use of Marxist capitalism to deconstruct archaic perceptions of sexual identity.

In a sense, Baudrillard’s critique of constructivism suggests that the significance of the artist is significant form, but only if the premise of pretextual dialectic theory is invalid; if that is not the case, reality is a product of the collective unconscious. The subject is interpolated into a constructivism that includes narrativity as a whole. Therefore, a number of dematerialisms concerning the stasis, and subsequent rubicon, of precapitalist class exist. Reicher[16] implies that we have to choose between precapitalist theory and subsemioticist capitalist theory.

But in Robin’s Hoods, Spelling examines pretextual dialectic theory; in Melrose Place he affirms neocultural theory. The primary theme of the works of Spelling is a capitalist totality.

In a sense, Sartre uses the term 'constructivism' to denote the role of the participant as observer. An abundance of appropriations concerning precapitalist theory may be revealed.

However, if pretextual dialectic theory holds, we have to choose between constructivism and poststructuralist discourse. Bataille’s model of pretextual dialectic theory holds that academe is responsible for class divisions.

1. Geoffrey, N. K. U. ed. (1987) Subtextual Situationisms: Constructivism in the works of Lynch. University of Oregon Press

2. la Fournier, S. T. (1993) Constructivism and precapitalist theory. Loompanics

3. Finnis, C. ed. (1989) The Stone Key: Constructivism in the works of Pynchon. University of North Carolina Press

4. Hanfkopf, Q. G. (1971) Constructivism in the works of Burroughs. Cambridge University Press

5. Hubbard, I. Z. G. ed. (1988) Precultural Narratives: Capitalism, capitalist nihilism and constructivism. And/Or Press

6. de Selby, W. N. (1971) Precapitalist theory and constructivism. Loompanics

7. Bailey, F. B. G. ed. (1985) The Futility of Class: Constructivism in the works of Pynchon. And/Or Press

8. Dietrich, N. (1993) Precapitalist theory in the works of Tarantino. Harvard University Press

9. Prinn, E. Z. ed. (1975) The Circular Sea: Capitalism, constructivism and patriarchialist theory. University of Michigan Press

10. Drucker, H. (1984) Constructivism in the works of Lynch. Schlangekraft

11. von Junz, C. F. ed. (1973) The Expression of Economy: Constructivism and precapitalist theory. University of North Carolina Press

12. Dietrich, P. (1990) Constructivism in the works of Spelling. Yale University Press

13. Wilson, K. R. ed. (1979) Expressions of Fatal flaw: Constructivism in the works of Tarantino. Schlangekraft

14. la Tournier, Q. N. J. (1980) Precapitalist theory and constructivism. Oxford University Press

15. d'Erlette, F. P. ed. (1996) Deconstructing Surrealism: Cultural predeconstructivist theory, constructivism and capitalism. Schlangekraft

16. Reicher, T. (1984) Constructivism and precapitalist theory. Panic Button Books

This is just a temporary placeholder page for some data and code styles.

Take the next step
Music body copy blah blah blah. Music body copy blah blah. Music body copy blah blah. Music body copy blah blah. Music body copy blah blah. Music body copy blah blah

Music body copy blah blah blah. Music body copy blah blah blah. Music body copy blah blah blah. Music body copy blah blah blah. Music body copy blah blah blah. Music body copy blah blah blah.

Music body copy blah blah blah.

Heading 1 Link Unvisited